The Review of APK 3 6 9 V3 with SJRC F22S Remote Modification in a Signal-Intervened Area
In this article, we will review the performance of the APK 3 6 9 V3 with SJRC F22S remote modification in a densely populated area with signal intervention. The recorded video above was reviewed on January 19, 2024, in the afternoon at 17:44. Meanwhile, the video below was recorded today, January 20, 2024, at 44 minutes past the hour.
Reviewing the Location
In the video above, I aim to review the location of a fire incident. The camera is directed towards the west, specifically towards Samarinda City. On the other hand, the video below is directed towards the north, capturing the music scene in Samarinda City.
Signal Interruptions
During the review, it is important to note that there were signal interruptions. In the video above, when reaching a distance of 2 kilometers, the signal was briefly interrupted. However, it resumed smoothly after adjusting the altitude. In the video below, there was a slight signal disruption at a distance of 23 but it did not have a significant impact on the overall performance.
Troubleshooting and Successful Transmission
In both videos, there were moments where the signal was almost lost, specifically when approaching the fire incident at a distance of 24. However, by adjusting the altitude, the transmission was restored, and the video continued without further interruptions. In the video above, the transmission remained stable until a distance of 3 kilometers. On the other hand, the video below experienced slight lag at distances of 27 and 28.
It is important to note that modifications on the SJRC F22S remote were made to enhance its performance and overcome signal interventions. While the modifications were not completely flawless, they succeeded in maintaining a relatively stable signal transmission in this densely populated area with signal disruptions. Further adjustments and enhancements may be necessary to optimize the performance of this APK with remote SJRC F22S modification.
